<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek 2.0 &#8211; Does It Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/</link>
	<description>A meeting place for myth, imagination, and mystery in pop culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:56:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheoFantastique &#124; A meeting place for myth, imagination, and mystery in pop culture.</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-5398</link>
		<dc:creator>TheoFantastique &#124; A meeting place for myth, imagination, and mystery in pop culture.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 02:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-5398</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Star Trek 2.0: Does it Work?&#8221;    Back to Top Tags: conventions, documentary, fan cultures, geek cultures, science fiction, science fiction conventions, Star Trek   Cancel ReplyWrite a Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Star Trek 2.0: Does it Work?&#8221;    Back to Top Tags: conventions, documentary, fan cultures, geek cultures, science fiction, science fiction conventions, Star Trek   Cancel ReplyWrite a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 11:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>This stupidity is the typical example of what you should not do in Science Fiction. It does not respects what science fiction MUST respect. The science in SF is very important. But also, the movie is totally inconsistent with itself. The bad guy who  attacks those who tried to help him, who has the possibility of preventing the destruction of its planet but prefers to wait for a hypothetical vengeance etc.... The Vulcans transformed into racists, a down-market humor, promotions which fall of the sky, the federation transformed into cowboys etc... etc... the list is very, very long...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stupidity is the typical example of what you should not do in Science Fiction. It does not respects what science fiction MUST respect. The science in SF is very important. But also, the movie is totally inconsistent with itself. The bad guy who  attacks those who tried to help him, who has the possibility of preventing the destruction of its planet but prefers to wait for a hypothetical vengeance etc&#8230;. The Vulcans transformed into racists, a down-market humor, promotions which fall of the sky, the federation transformed into cowboys etc&#8230; etc&#8230; the list is very, very long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I liked it, and I am a HUGE Star Trek fan.  I am much more impressed with this movie then I was with &quot;Enterprise&quot;.  Your timeline of Kirk serving on the Farragut is out the window if that ship is destroyed in the first moments of the film.  Timeline changes, everything is fair game.  Their are a couple of notebable problems that should not have been affected by the convient time thingy.  Like Kirks OLDER brother not existing at all! 

Also, if you could use &quot;story arches&quot; more in your posts and responses that would be great.  I just don&#039;t think society as a whole uses that phrase enough. 

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked it, and I am a HUGE Star Trek fan.  I am much more impressed with this movie then I was with &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;.  Your timeline of Kirk serving on the Farragut is out the window if that ship is destroyed in the first moments of the film.  Timeline changes, everything is fair game.  Their are a couple of notebable problems that should not have been affected by the convient time thingy.  Like Kirks OLDER brother not existing at all! </p>
<p>Also, if you could use &#8220;story arches&#8221; more in your posts and responses that would be great.  I just don&#8217;t think society as a whole uses that phrase enough. </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W. Morehead</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. Morehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-534</guid>
		<description>XTC, I am very familiar with the story&#039;s plot, which I mentioned in my post, and thus am well aware as to the alternative timeline issues and why they are there. The next time you critique a critic please try to do so more courteously and read the original post more carefully before offering your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XTC, I am very familiar with the story&#8217;s plot, which I mentioned in my post, and thus am well aware as to the alternative timeline issues and why they are there. The next time you critique a critic please try to do so more courteously and read the original post more carefully before offering your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xTc</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>xTc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-532</guid>
		<description>At the end of the film when the villain is destroyed,  in part by suction into a black hole which also brought them into a timeline which resulted in the overarching storyline’s contradictions, I assumed all would be set to right as the alternative timeline and life stories of the characters on the Enterprise would be reset to those consistent with the original series.

You must have missed the part where the red matter mixed with the energy of the sun. They said that the red matter had the potential to create black holes, then mixed with the energy of the sun that black hole formed a worm hole.

At the end when spock annihilates the ship, there is no sun energy so it just forms a black hole, essentially ripping apart the ship.

Please, if you&#039;re going to criticize at least understand what&#039;s going on in the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the film when the villain is destroyed,  in part by suction into a black hole which also brought them into a timeline which resulted in the overarching storyline’s contradictions, I assumed all would be set to right as the alternative timeline and life stories of the characters on the Enterprise would be reset to those consistent with the original series.</p>
<p>You must have missed the part where the red matter mixed with the energy of the sun. They said that the red matter had the potential to create black holes, then mixed with the energy of the sun that black hole formed a worm hole.</p>
<p>At the end when spock annihilates the ship, there is no sun energy so it just forms a black hole, essentially ripping apart the ship.</p>
<p>Please, if you&#8217;re going to criticize at least understand what&#8217;s going on in the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Continuity is a sticky wicket. 

On the one hand it&#039;s a testimony both to a franchise&#039;s capacity for sustaining a lengthy narrative and for it&#039;s ability to engender a fan base that cares about it enough to have that concern. Related to something else entirely, I watched an interview with Jeff Burke - the Imagineer who developed the Phantom Manor at Disneyland Paris - where he was telling fans to get over trying to make a story out of the ride. I thought he underestimated how much these fans loved it enough to try.

On the other hand, I&#039;ve learned an important lesson in the last few years of watching GALAXY EXPRESS 999 and DOCTOR WHO about not letting continuity interfere with telling a good story. I had some seeds of it before too... Trekwise, the flat- vs. ridged-foreheads on Klingons never was an issue, and the &quot;explanation&quot; Worf gave in DS9 was entertaining and good enough for me. It wasn&#039;t something I ever felt required an in-continuity answer.

I think the point for me where that all implodes is where continuity is ignored for the sake of sloppiness. That was the whole fault of ENTERPRISE... They kept spitting in the face of continuity in a show that was supposed to fit into continuity in order to tell stories that just plain sucked. The only times they ever managed to nail it was the primiere and the body of the fourth season. 

I haven&#039;t seen the new Trek yet, and I&#039;m a bit mixed on the whole idea. I had thought that the progress towards it told the creators something, but I&#039;m not sure. Basically, it starts with ENTERPRISE and people getting excited about returning to the original series setting, aliens, concepts, etc. but with modern production values. ENTERPRISE blew it for the most part, until they brought on Manny Coto who understood what it was supposed to be. Thus the fourth season delivered in spades: Augments, flat-headed Klingons, Mirror Universe, Tholians, Gorn, uniting the four founder races against the Romulans, Terra Prime... Too little too late, so they move on to updating the original series with new effects, and it was great. There was a little disconnect between the old sets and the new space scenes, but I was satisfied. 

Then they announce a movie that theoretically fused the two: the &quot;origin story&quot; of the original series. Sure they changed the costumes and sets and look of the ship, but so what? Flat- vs. ridged-foreheads. Big deal. But now we&#039;ve got time travel and planets getting blowed up and everything else and it&#039;s giving flashbacks of the Temporal Cold War. And if it&#039;s in-continuity, where the Hell is Starfleet Temporal Investigations? They&#039;ve delt with less important changes to the timestream in regular episodes. 

The last part is being pedantic, but it&#039;s hearkening to my belief that if they wanted to reboot it, they should have just rebooted it. Ultimate Star Trek. Cool. However, I haven&#039;t seen it yet and maybe it&#039;ll stand up once I do. I am planning on seeing it and it&#039;s the first Trek show that my girlfriend has actually wanted to have anything to do with, so I guess that&#039;s a point in favor ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuity is a sticky wicket. </p>
<p>On the one hand it&#8217;s a testimony both to a franchise&#8217;s capacity for sustaining a lengthy narrative and for it&#8217;s ability to engender a fan base that cares about it enough to have that concern. Related to something else entirely, I watched an interview with Jeff Burke &#8211; the Imagineer who developed the Phantom Manor at Disneyland Paris &#8211; where he was telling fans to get over trying to make a story out of the ride. I thought he underestimated how much these fans loved it enough to try.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;ve learned an important lesson in the last few years of watching GALAXY EXPRESS 999 and DOCTOR WHO about not letting continuity interfere with telling a good story. I had some seeds of it before too&#8230; Trekwise, the flat- vs. ridged-foreheads on Klingons never was an issue, and the &#8220;explanation&#8221; Worf gave in DS9 was entertaining and good enough for me. It wasn&#8217;t something I ever felt required an in-continuity answer.</p>
<p>I think the point for me where that all implodes is where continuity is ignored for the sake of sloppiness. That was the whole fault of ENTERPRISE&#8230; They kept spitting in the face of continuity in a show that was supposed to fit into continuity in order to tell stories that just plain sucked. The only times they ever managed to nail it was the primiere and the body of the fourth season. </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the new Trek yet, and I&#8217;m a bit mixed on the whole idea. I had thought that the progress towards it told the creators something, but I&#8217;m not sure. Basically, it starts with ENTERPRISE and people getting excited about returning to the original series setting, aliens, concepts, etc. but with modern production values. ENTERPRISE blew it for the most part, until they brought on Manny Coto who understood what it was supposed to be. Thus the fourth season delivered in spades: Augments, flat-headed Klingons, Mirror Universe, Tholians, Gorn, uniting the four founder races against the Romulans, Terra Prime&#8230; Too little too late, so they move on to updating the original series with new effects, and it was great. There was a little disconnect between the old sets and the new space scenes, but I was satisfied. </p>
<p>Then they announce a movie that theoretically fused the two: the &#8220;origin story&#8221; of the original series. Sure they changed the costumes and sets and look of the ship, but so what? Flat- vs. ridged-foreheads. Big deal. But now we&#8217;ve got time travel and planets getting blowed up and everything else and it&#8217;s giving flashbacks of the Temporal Cold War. And if it&#8217;s in-continuity, where the Hell is Starfleet Temporal Investigations? They&#8217;ve delt with less important changes to the timestream in regular episodes. </p>
<p>The last part is being pedantic, but it&#8217;s hearkening to my belief that if they wanted to reboot it, they should have just rebooted it. Ultimate Star Trek. Cool. However, I haven&#8217;t seen it yet and maybe it&#8217;ll stand up once I do. I am planning on seeing it and it&#8217;s the first Trek show that my girlfriend has actually wanted to have anything to do with, so I guess that&#8217;s a point in favor ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Cory and Ken, thanks for the thoughts on black holes and quantum gobbledygook. I figured there had to be something this going on to free up a little storyline creativity. Still, I prefer a little more continuity in my overall story arches. It will be interesting to see how well this is received, and what future installments may hold for the franchise. Hopefully a little mroe substance will surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory and Ken, thanks for the thoughts on black holes and quantum gobbledygook. I figured there had to be something this going on to free up a little storyline creativity. Still, I prefer a little more continuity in my overall story arches. It will be interesting to see how well this is received, and what future installments may hold for the franchise. Hopefully a little mroe substance will surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 05:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I think the idea is that the black hole sent Spock and Nero not merely into their own past, but into an entirely different timeline, a la &quot;Mirror, Mirror.&quot; This gives the writers the freedom to explore these beloved characters all over again &lt;i&gt;without&lt;/i&gt; having to worry about continuity. Personally, I like that idea, as it means that anything could happen: things don&#039;t have to (and probably won&#039;t) turn out the same as they did in the original timeline, so we can&#039;t know in advance that everything will be alright.

What bothers me about this new Trek is not the continuity issue, but the impression that they are replacing substance with image. There was a lot of action and CGI--and it was certainly exciting and beautiful--but there was very little story or theme. In fact, the plot was marked more by coincidence than anything else, and every time they approached an important issue--destiny vs. free will, logic vs. faith, revenge, genocide--it was quickly pushed aside in a rush to the next battle. 

The characters carried the film, and for now I&#039;m content with that, but I really hope they can find some more intellectual depth for the next installment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the idea is that the black hole sent Spock and Nero not merely into their own past, but into an entirely different timeline, a la &#8220;Mirror, Mirror.&#8221; This gives the writers the freedom to explore these beloved characters all over again <i>without</i> having to worry about continuity. Personally, I like that idea, as it means that anything could happen: things don&#8217;t have to (and probably won&#8217;t) turn out the same as they did in the original timeline, so we can&#8217;t know in advance that everything will be alright.</p>
<p>What bothers me about this new Trek is not the continuity issue, but the impression that they are replacing substance with image. There was a lot of action and CGI&#8211;and it was certainly exciting and beautiful&#8211;but there was very little story or theme. In fact, the plot was marked more by coincidence than anything else, and every time they approached an important issue&#8211;destiny vs. free will, logic vs. faith, revenge, genocide&#8211;it was quickly pushed aside in a rush to the next battle. </p>
<p>The characters carried the film, and for now I&#8217;m content with that, but I really hope they can find some more intellectual depth for the next installment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.theofantastique.com/2009/05/08/star-trek-20-does-it-work/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theofantastique.com/?p=939#comment-515</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you read that famous interview with the writer where he kept going on and on about quantum theory and assorted gobbledygook. It was mostly nonsense except for one line of win. In addressing the issue of how the original timeline and the new one could coexist as quantum parallels, he used the example that when this film is released everyone&#039;s DVDs of the original Star Trek will still exist.

I don&#039;t think &quot;restoring the timeline&quot; is their major concern ^_~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you read that famous interview with the writer where he kept going on and on about quantum theory and assorted gobbledygook. It was mostly nonsense except for one line of win. In addressing the issue of how the original timeline and the new one could coexist as quantum parallels, he used the example that when this film is released everyone&#8217;s DVDs of the original Star Trek will still exist.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;restoring the timeline&#8221; is their major concern ^_~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

